Greyhound Corporation v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
WILL, District Judge.
In this action under Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 2284 and 2321-2325, Greyhound challenges the validity of two orders of the Commission, dated August 31, 1961, and January 12, 1962, under which Carolina is authorized to operate regular direct service over an alternate route between Columbia and Orangeburg, South Carolina. The orders in question were issued by the Commission under section (c)(8)(i) of what are known as its Deviation Rules, 49 C.F.R. §§ 211.1 et seq.
Prior to October, 1960, Carolina operated no direct or through service between Columbia and Orangeburg. It…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rutherford v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Yu v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Legge v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Refrigerated Transport Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975