Legal Opinion
Riss & Company v. Association of American Railroads
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 3, 1959No. Civ. A. 4056-54PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIRICA, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss certain “common law” counterclaims of defendants on the ground that these counterclaims do not state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and that this Court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter.
Sixteen of the remaining individual railroad defendants in this civil antitrust suit have filed counterclaims against plaintiff, Riss & Company, Inc., alleging violations of certain federal and state laws and regulations relating to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- TI ME Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baggett Transportation Company v. Hughes Transportation, Inc., and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- State of South Dakota v. National Bank of South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1963
- Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Aluminum Co. of Amer. v. Admiral Merch. Motor Frgt., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- State of South Dakota v. The National Bank of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, and First Bank Stock CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.