Legal Opinion

Wikert v. Northern Sand and Gravel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1987No. C5-86-1111PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This case was originally brought under theories of strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. At the time of trial, appellant settled with defendant Newhouse and released Newhouse by Pierringer release. Respondent moved for summary judgment and sought a motion in limine to preclude appellant from introducing evidence at trial of respondent’s post-accident conduct of advising persons concerning the nature of concrete. Appellant brought a motion to strike respondent’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of untimely service. The trial court granted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Wilson v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Niazi v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Colby v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  3. Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. McKenzie v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Beniek v. Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API