Legal Opinion

Freeguard v. Bingham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 4, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

The parties executed a written agreement, providing that the defendant ‘ ‘ does lease, let ’ ’ unto the plaintiff defendant’s farm in Ferrisburg “with all tools on said farm, and all stock herein named, twenty-nine cows,” etc., from March 1, 1934, to February 28, 1935. Bach party agreed to “furnish” two horses, and each agreed to pay for one-half of all feed, fertilizer, seed, taxes, etc. The plaintiff agreed to carry on the farm in a good husbandlike manner and to pay as rent one-half of all produce, profits, and increase in stock. The farm was mainly a dairy farm and the principal source of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. Wood v. JamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  3. Vermont Kaolin Corp. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  4. Partridge v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Vermont Shade Roller Co. v. Burlington Traction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. Kerr & Elliott v. Green Mountain Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Powers v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  5. C. E. Johnson & Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API