Legal Opinion

Kerr & Elliott v. Green Mountain Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 11, 1941PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtbvant, J.

This is an action of contract. The defendant pleaded the general issue and special matter in defense. Trial was by jury at the March term, 1940, of Washington County Court. The verdict and judgment thereon were for the plaintiffs and the case is here upon the defendant’s exceptions.

The plaintiffs, partners in business, are now, and for more than ten years last past have been, conducting a general insurance agency at Northfield, Vermont. During all times material here they have had agency contracts with from thirty-five to forty insurance companies, and they have had an agency contract with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Wood v. JamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. Port Investment Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. East Jersey Water Co. v. BigelowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MerlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  3. Garrett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. V. L. Phillips & Co., Inc. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mut. Cas. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  5. Aitken v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API