Legal Opinion
H. P. Hood & Sons v. Heins
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 1, 1964No. 310PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C. J.
The plaintiff, H. P. Hood & Sons has invoked equity jurisdiction to obtain declaratory relief from an agreement it made with the several defendants, or their predecessors. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts which include the context of the undertaking which the plaintiff seeks to have declared null and void.
The contract is dated March 13, 1945. The plaintiff, a Massachusetts corporation, is designated as the “Dealer.” The defendants are described as being various farmer residents of Chittenden County, referred to in the instrument as “Local Producers” and “Boston…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Moers v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Griswold v. Heat CorporationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Bergeron v. BoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Marcrum v. EmbrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- In Re McKinstryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1986
- Stevens v. CROSS ABBOTT COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.