Legal Opinion

Partridge v. Cole

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 4, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The action is tort, for damages occasioned by the alleged neglect of certain live stock owned by the plaintiff *283and kept on a farm occupied and carried on by tbe defendant as a tenant. After alleging the duty of tbe defendant with respect to tbe live stock, tbe complaint charges: 4 4 Tbe defendant failed in said duty in tbis, to wit, that be wilfully, maliciously and negligently failed and neglected to properly feed and care for tbe livestock upon said farm; that be failed to milk the cows at proper and regular hours; that be failed to water tbe stock at proper and regular hours; that be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  2. Boyden v. Fitchburg RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  3. Moore v. DukeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  4. In re CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Phelps v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ronan v. J. G. Turnbull Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  2. Giguere, Admr. v. RosselotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In Re Estate of JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Picknell v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API