Legal Opinion
Laske v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
By way of eminent domain the city of Hartford took land of the plaintiffs for redevelopment purposes and filed a statement of compensation. On appeal to the Superior Court, the matter was referred to a state referee, who, exercising the powers of that court, reviewed the damages and ordered the appeal dismissed. From that judgment the plaintiffs have appealed to this court, assigning error in the finding of facts, in the overruling of a claim of law, and in the conclusions reached.
The plaintiffs have made numerous attacks on the finding. Only those which have been briefed will be considered.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brauer v. FrecciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Board of Education v. Shelton Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- AFSCME, Council 4, Local 704 v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- City of New London v. PicinichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Williams v. CoppolaConnecticut Superior Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.