Legal Opinion
City of New London v. Picinich
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 20, 2003No. AC 22750PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The named defendant, Thomas J. Picinich,1 appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, the city of New London, pursuant to the defendant’s appeal and application for review of a statement of compensation for condemnation. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly determined the highest and best use of the condemned property. In support of this claim, the defendant argues that in valuing the property, the trial court (1) failed to consider the value of the subject property as assembled with nearby properties, (2)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Bakery Place Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- ROUTE 188, LLC v. Town of MiddleburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Town of Montville v. AntoninoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- City of Norwich v. Styx Investors in Norwich, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.