Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. Bunch-Morrow Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for damages to an automobile insured under a “collision policy” issued by appellant. t
Count 1 followed the Code form analogous thereto, and was sufficient as against the demurrer interposed. Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 503; Royal Exch. Ass’n v. Almon, 202 Ala. 374, 80 So. 456.
It is insisted the defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge both upon the theory of a failure on the part of plaintiff to furnish written proof of loss within GO' days as stipulated in the policy, and, also, by reason of failure of proof to show the car was damaged by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Royal Exchange Assurance of London v. AlmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Remmick v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Pettibone v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. LangfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. EdmonsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Moore v. Union Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.