Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Edmonson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit was upon a policy of insurance issued September 9, 1921.
The- policy was of that type which is known as a “non-cancellable” insurance policy, and provided indemnity for loss of time by accident or sickness. The plaintiff, having become disabled from sickness in 1935, was paid by defendant for a short period of time, about six months, and the defendant then denied further liability because of alleged misrepresentations in the original application for the insurance. The suit sought to enforce the terms of the policy, and the judgment was for the principal payments due on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin v. PateDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1990
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Crumpton v. Pilgrim Health & Life Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- All States Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Volunteer State Life Ins. Co. v. DanleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948