Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Langford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 1937No. 4 Div. 972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit was based upon a group life insurance policy.

The terms of a similar policy, with respect to total and permanent disabilit>, were considered in Equitable Life, etc. v. Davis, 231 Ala. 261, 164 So. 86. See, also, Protective Life Ins. Co. v. Cole, 230 Ala. 450, 161 So. 818; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Hill, 230 Ala. 505, 161 So. 800; Prudential Ins. Co. v. Gray, 230 Ala. 1, 159 So. 265.

The instant complaint was that on December 22, 1933, plaintiff, while insured under said policy of group insurance, became and was totally and permanently disabled by disease; that she…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Continental Insurance v. ParkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Cain v. SkillinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Prudential Ins. Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bates v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Jones v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Air Comfort Engineers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. Emergency Aid Ins. Co. v. PlummerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Gilford v. Emergency Aid Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API