Legal Opinion

Ford v. Mitchell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 10, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1517PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kevin C. Ford (“Ford”) brings causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and, alternatively, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), for unlawful seizure under the Fourth Amendment (Count I), and over detention under the Fifth Amendment (Count II) against Defendants Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) officials Jane and John Does 1-2 (collectively “BOP Defendants”) in their individual capacities; the United States Parole Commission (“USPC”) officials Cranston…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Steele v. MeyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Stoddard v. WynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Dukore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Adeboya v. the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API