Legal Opinion

Rice v. Wood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 8621DC143PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendants first assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motions for directed verdict made at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence and all the evidence. By introducing evidence, defendants waived their motion made at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence. Overman v. Products Co., 30 N.C. App. 516, 227 S.E. 2d 159 (1976). We therefore consider only the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motion made at the close of all the evidence. Defendants contend that the evidence presented conclusively shows that the transac tion was an absolute sale with a contract or option to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Gregory v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. USAA Casualty Insurance v. RandolphSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. State v. RichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Stephenson v. Town of GarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Crump v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API