Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Power

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1927No. Civil No. 2624Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The plaintiff and appellant, Mitchell, as the owner of lands in agricultural improvement district No. 3, Maricopa county, Arizona, brought this action against the board of directors of such district, to wit, J. O. Power, R. W. Simkins and Fred Wilson, defendants and appellees, charging that said district was not legally organized, and that its proposed bond issue is void. The relief sought was an adjudication of the legality of the organization of the district and of the bond issue.

The complaint sets out in detail the steps taken in the organization of the district, showing, in general, that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API