Fogg v. Perris Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from orders refusing new trials.- E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The above-entitled cases were before this court on former appeals from judgments in favor of the defendant and intervener in each ease, given upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. Those judgments were reversed. (People v. Perris Irr. Dist., 142 Cal. 601, [76 Pac. 381]; Fogg v. Perris Irr. Dist., 142 Cal. 18, [76 Pac. 1127].)
Upon the going down of the remittitur the defendant and the intervener, respectively, filed answers in each ease, the two cases were tried and submitted on the same evidence, findings and judgment in each case were made and given for the defendant and intervener,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hughson v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stimson v. Alessandro Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Leeman v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Kustoff v. ChaplinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- County of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pioneer Irrigation District v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Tufts v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.