Legal Opinion
Chu Bros. Tulsa Partnership, P.L.L. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 2010No. CA2009-09-020PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ringland, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the Sherwin-Williams Company, appeals a decision granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Chu Brothers Tulsa Partnership, P.L.L.
{¶ 2} On January 28, 2005, Sherwin-Williams entered into a commercial lease with Thomson Mohler, the owner of a parcel of land at 425 Lafayette Street, *263London, Ohio, to operate a retail store at the location. Chu Brothers purchased the real estate from Thomson Mohler, subject to the lease, on August 8, 2006.
{¶ 3} In 2003, the city of London passed Ordinance 193-02 implementing a tax-increment-financing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Burgess v. TackasOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hill v. HigdonOhio Supreme Court · 1855
- Tax Increment Financing Commission of Kansas City v. J.E. Dunn Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. Schneider, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Williams v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals · 2017