Legal Opinion

Tax Increment Financing Commission of Kansas City v. J.E. Dunn Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 12, 1989No. 71318PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Appellant J.E. Dunn Construction Company (“Dunn”) challenges the constitutionality of the Missouri Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Sections 99.800 to 99.865, RSMo 1986 (“the Act”). The trial court upheld the constitutionality of the Act, ordered Dunn’s property condemned, and awarded Dunn damages. Because Dunn questions the constitutionality of the Act, we have original appellate jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. The judgment is affirmed.

I

A

The Act permits a municipality to create a tax increment financing commission, the actions of which are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Roberts v. McNarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Mo. State Bd. v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Keller v. Marion County Ambulance DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Saint Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  5. Franklin County Ex Rel. Parks v. Franklin County CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API