Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Tackas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1998No. 71945PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackmon, Presiding Judge.

Yong Burgess, plaintiff-appellant, appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Libby Aurora Trailer Park, Jack Glazer, Aaron Goldstein, Julius Glazer, and Joe Management Company, defendants-appellees. Burgess argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment, because she showed that appellees were negligent when they allowed Terri Tackas and Paul Marino to possess on their property two dogs in violation of the one-dog rule. This, she says, was the basis for her injuries when she was bitten by one of their dogs. She assigns the following error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Flint v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Riley v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. KolenichOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Bravard v. CurranOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Vanderbilt v. Pier 27, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Touhey v. Ed's Tree & Turf, L.L.COhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Wells Fargo v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API