Legal Opinion

People v. William Henning Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ op Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick E. Fake, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This was an action of debt brought in October, 1912, in the municipal court of Chicago, to collect a fine for a violation of the Pure Food statute enacted in 1907, as amended in 1911. The trial court found defendant in error not guilty and entered judgment accordingly. From that judgment this writ of error was sued out.

The first, and perhaps chief, controversy is as to the proper construction of section 11 of said statute. It is, however, further insisted by counsel for defendant in error that if the construction contended for by them is not correct, the statute is unconstitutional in so far…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Schmidinger v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Town of Lake View v. Rose Hill Cemetery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. People v. . ArensbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carolene Products Co. v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People Ex Rel. Royal v. CainIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Greene v. L. Fish Furniture Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. KartusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Kehl v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API