Legal Opinion

Carolene Products Co. v. McLaughlin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1936No. 23737. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The Carolene Products Company filed a complaint in the circuit court of Sangamon county to restrain Walter W. McLaughlin, Director of Agriculture, from enforcing against it the provisions of a statute known as the Filled Milk act, filed July 19, 1935,-and in force ninety days thereafter. (Laws of 1935, p. 886; State Bar Stat. 1935, p. 1682; Smith-Hurd Stat. 1935, p. 1699.) A temporary injunction was issued. The defendant answered the complaint. Evidence was heard and a decree was entered finding the act unconstitutional and granting a permanent injunction. The defendant prosecutes this appeal.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Winter v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Gillespie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People Ex Rel. Heydenreich v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. SpegalIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Memorial Gardens Ass'n, Inc. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API