Wilkinson v. Dodd
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Bird, V. C.
The bill in this case was filed by the cemplainant, who had been appointed receiver of the Newark Savings Institution, against the managers of that institution, to recover from them the losses which resulted from the illegal use of the securities and of the moneys of the institution by them. To this bill, nine demurrers have been filed; six of them are general and three for want of parties. Hence, is there a want of. necessary parties, or is there an absence of equity ? These inquiries cover the case. I must be guided by the statement of the facts in the bill, so far as they are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Butts v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- National Bank of Newburgh v. . BiglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fisher v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Havey v. HofmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Silverman v. KolkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977