Legal Opinion

Butts v. . Wood

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1867PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of the defendant, Daniel Wood, was presented, audited and ordered to be paid at a meeting of the board of directors of the company, on the 5th day of July, 1859, when but three of the five directors who composed the board were present, the defendant, Daniel Wood, being one of those present, and his father, William Wood, and John Cornwall, another kinsman, being the other two. This board, as thus constituted, had no authority to entertain the bill in question, or to do any thing in relation to it. Daniel Wood, being the claimant, was disqualified from acting, because he could not deal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Clarkson v. De PeysterNew York Court of Chancery · 1831

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Duncomb v. . N.Y., H. N.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API