Legal Opinion
Havey v. Hofmann
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 19, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This suit was brought by complainant, as receiver of Foremost Silk Hosiery Mills, Incorporated, hereinafter to avoid confusion, called Mills, against its former directors and also two corporations, Alfred Hofmann, Incorporated, and Foremost Silk Hosiery Company, Incorporated, hereinafter referred to as Company.
In substance, it is claimed on behalf of complainant, on final hearing, that conveyances were made by Mills in contemplation of its insolvency and while it was insolvent, and that the acts of its directors in consummating these transactions were such a dereliction of their duty that it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Cope v. C. B. Walton Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Cope v. C. B. Walton Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
- Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schafer Ball Bearings Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Regina Music Box Co. v. F. G. Otto & SonsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monsanto Co. v. Alden Leeds, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Newark Ladder, C. v. Furniture Workers, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Yacker v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Cohen v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.