Legal Opinion

Booth v. Scheer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1919No. 22,256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Brown district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This action grows out of an alleged breach of warranty in a horse trade.

The plaintiff Booth traded a stallion, “Cranmore King,” and gave $550 in cash to the defendant Scheer for a stallion, “Nig,” and a breeding jack.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant represented to him that the stallion “Nig” was sound and healthy and suitable for breed*644ing purposes, and that plaintiff relied thereon, but that such representation was false and fraudulent, and that defendant made such statement knowingly and for the purpose of cheating the plaintiff. He further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Roberts v. Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Van Winkle & Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Nelson v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. Burns v. Baldwin-Doherty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  5. Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API