Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Worthington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

If a deed is duly executed and delivered, conveying land to a woman and “her children,” reserving a life estate to the grantors, do children born or in being at the time of the conveyance take the land as tenants in common with the mother, or do all the children born or in being at the termination of the reservation, take as tenants in common with the mother?

The question of law presented has been expressly decided in Cullens v. Cullens, 161 N. C., 344, 77 S. E., 228, where the principle was thus declared: “We think it well settled that where land is conveyed, as in this case, to a woman and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Ziegler v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Benbury v. . ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. . GrimsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Tate v. . AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API