Legal Opinion
United States v. Dwaine Copeland
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 5, 1994No. 92-3240PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Per curiam
Dwaine Copeland appeals from a judgment revoking his supervised release. He contends that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that he violated the conditions of his release and violated his due process rights in faffing to make written findings of the evidence on which it relied. .We affirm the district court.
I
Appellant, convicted and sentenced for importing cocaine into the United States, completed his three year prison term and commenced three years of supervised release. One of the conditions of his supervised release was that he not purchase, possess, use, or distribute…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Sammy Ray CopleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- United States v. Ronald Keith BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. William Joseph FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MaglutaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. John Dale Ramsdale, Charles ChristofersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.