Legal Opinion
United States v. William Joseph Frazier
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 14, 1994No. 92-9201PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
Appellant William Frazier (“Frazier”) appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. Frazier contends that the district court erred in its determination that he violated the conditions of his supervised release. Specifically, Frazier argues that the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to supervised release revocation hearings, and thus he contests the admission and consideration of hearsay testimony at his revocation hearing. We hold that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in supervised release revocation proceedings. In addition, we hold that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Juan Baptista-Rodriguez, Ramon Calvo, and Julio R. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Martin David StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Dwaine CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- United States v. Charles C. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Lamond D. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Woody Hyatt McCormick Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Curtis v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.