Legal Opinion

Converse v. Town of Charleston

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 6, 1992No. 90-377PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

Plaintiff property owners appeal from a directed verdict, based on res judicata, for defendant Town of Charleston. We reverse and remand to permit plaintiffs to seek damages for the town’s alleged breach of duty to properly maintain the road in question from the date of an earlier action against a neighbor.

Plaintiffs purchased property in Charleston in 1970. A neighbor, believing that he owned the road that provided access to plaintiffs’ property, engaged in various tactics designed to prevent use of the road. Ultimately, the neighbor obliterated the road by creating a pond in its place which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. MerryfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. In Re Quechee Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morrisseau v. FayetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Matthew Burgess v. Lamoille Housing Partnership, Town of Morristown, Mary Ann Wilson as Collector of Taxes and Sharon Green, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Merrilees v. TREASURER, State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Galkin v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API