Legal Opinion

Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. Merryfield

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 23, 1991No. 90-032PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Plaintiff, Highgate Associates, Ltd., the owner of a federally subsidized housing project in Barre, appeals the trial court’s ruling that the late charge provision contained in its lease agreements is void as an unenforceable penalty. We affirm.

Defendant, Lorna Merryfield, occupied an apartment in the project beginning in January of 1986. The lease contained the following provision:

If the Tenant does not pay the full amount of the rent by the end of the 5th day of the month, the Owner may collect a fee of $5.00 on the 6th day of the month, the Owner may collect a fee of $1.00 for each…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Walter Implement, Inc. v. FochtWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Liberty Life Insurance Company v. Thomas B. Hartley Construction Company Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mullin v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. Hoover (Letourneau) v. HooverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Rubin v. Sterling Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API