Legal Opinion

Merrilees v. TREASURER, State of Vermont

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1992No. 91-114PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At issue is whether passage of Senate Bill 39 (1985), codified at 13 V.S.A. §§ 7281-7283, levying a $5.00 surcharge on certain penalties and fines paid to the state, violated the origination clause of the Vermont Constitution, Chapter II, § 6 (revenue bills must originate in the House of Representatives). The issue was raised in a class action brought by plaintiff Merrilees on behalf of all those against whom the surcharge had been levied. The trial court found that the contested measure was not a revenue bill and entered summary judgment in defendant’s favor. This appeal followed. We affirm.

F…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Rondle Lee Robertson v. Interstate Securities Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  4. Dakota Title & Escrow Co. v. World-Wide Steel Systems, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brouha v. PostmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Anne Arundel County Board of Education v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. LaFaso v. PatrissiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Lamb v. GeovjianSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Town of Richmond v. Wawaloam Reservation, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Russell v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API