Legal Opinion

Kroopf v. Guffey

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1986No. B014977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

183 Cal.App.3d 1351 (1986)

228 Cal. Rptr. 807

PHILIP KROOPF, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ALFRED M. GUFFEY, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. B014977.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 4, 1986.

COUNSEL

Philip Kroopf, in pro. per., and William J. Glucksman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lebovits & David and Moses Lebovits for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Plaintiff and appellant Philip Kroopf (Kroopf) appeals from an order granting the motion to quash service for lack of personal jurisdiction of defendant and respondent Alfred Guffey (Guffey).

Because…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. SCHOOL DIST. OF OKALOOSA CTY. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Felix v. Bomoro KommanditgesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API