Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Jennett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KOLKEY, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a California judgment based on a sister state money judgment in favor of plaintiff, Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (the Bank), and against defendant Rene Jennett (Jennett).
Jennett’s sole contention on appeal is that the sister state judgment—a deficiency judgment resulting from a foreclosure action in Hawaii—cannot be enforced against him because the judgment was taken by default following service by publication pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes section 634-23, subdivision (4). He argues that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- FIDELITY CREDITOR SERVICE, INC. v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Manco Contracting Co.(WLL) v. BezdikianCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Cummings v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hawkins v. SunTrust BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Wells Fargo Bank v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.