Legal Opinion

Hiller v. County of Anoka

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1995No. C1-94-2172Published

1Opinion of the Court

Syllabus by the Court

Minn.Stat. § 500.20 , subd. 2a (1988), bars enforcement of the condition in a fee simple determinable estate when the claim is asserted more than 30 years after the date of the deed.

OPINION

Appellants challenge summary judgment for county in a mandamus action to compel county to condemn property. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts are undisputed. In 1917, the Town of St. Francis was deeded a strip of land for a road. The Rum River North Regional Park was later established to the north of the strip. Private property lay to the south. In 1972 appellants Walter and Phyllis Hiller…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Buck v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Salt Lake City v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Illg v. Forum Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Finke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API