Peckham v. Hendren
Indiana Supreme Court
From tbe Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, C.
The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, sued the appellee upon a promissory note, executed by the latter and payable to the Hollow Cable Manufacturing Company, or bearer, for one hundred and four dollars and fifty cents, payable at the First National Bank of Danville, Indiana, with interest and attorneys’ fees, on the 1st day of December, 1877. The notéis alleged to have been assigned by endorsement to H. C. Preston, and by him delivered to the plaintiff before it became due.
The appellee answered the complaint in four paragraphs : First, the general denial; Second. Want of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Winchester v. Baltimore & Susquehanna R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Atlantic State Bank of Brooklyn v. SaveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Farmers & Citizens' Bank v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Washburn v. Inter-Mountain Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Pitman v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.