Hilbers v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the superior court’s judgment upholding the constitutionality of certain ordinances regulating and licensing massage parlors and physical culture studios in the Municipality of Anchorage. 1
AMC 10.40.010 requires that all operators and employees of physical culture studios and massage parlors must be licensed. Requirements for obtaining a license are that the applicant be at least eighteen years of age, not be addicted to drugs, have no felony convictions for two years prior to application or employment, and have no convictions of any…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Myrick v. Board of Pierce County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AnthonyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.