Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Abraham Gerges, J.

Claimant Exxon Mobil Corporation moves for an order, pursuant to Eminent Domain Procedure Law § 701, awarding it an additional allowance in the amount of $3,744,378.15 for actual and necessary costs, disbursements and expenses incurred.

Facts and Procedural Background

The City of New York acquired title to property formerly owned by Mobil Oil Corporation (hereinafter, Mobil Oil and its successor, Exxon Mobil, will be referred to as Mobil) on September 19, 1997 for use as part of the Newtown Creek Water Pollution Control Plant. As is also relevant herein, on…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hakes v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. 41 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 76,981, 45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 745 United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Evergreen Pipeline Construction Co., Inc., Evergreen Pipeline Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Merritt Meridian Construction Corp. And General Insurance Company of America, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants. Merritt Meridian Construction Corp., Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Transamerica Premier Insurance Company, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. BD v. DeBuonoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Long Beach v. Sun NLF Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API