Legal Opinion

Hakes v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1993No. Claim 71384; Claim 71348PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

These cases require review of the application of EDPL 701, which in a condemnation action authorizes a discretionary grant of costs, including attorney and expert fees, to a con demnee who is awarded an amount substantially in excess of the condemnor’s initial offer.

Hakes v State of New York

In 1981, the Hakes claimants purchased a 23-acre parcel of land in Steuben County for $14,000. In August 1982 and March 1983, the State appropriated 19.46 acres, for which it offered claimants $13,450. The highest and best use of the property was mining mineral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. MTR. STATE v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Patron v. PatronNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Matter of County of Westchester v. BaruchNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Town of Islip v. SikoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. R-GOSHEN LLC v. Village of GoshenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Estate of Haynes v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. J.W. Mays, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API