Carr v. Marshman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, Acting P. J.
In an action initiated under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (Code Civ. Proc., § 1650 et seq.; hereafter RURESA), the trial court held that Nancy Jean Marshman had no present obligation to pay child support. John William Carr appeals.
I
Marshman and Carr were divorced in 1976. The interlocutory decree rendered by a Sonoma County court gave her custody of the couple’s two minor children. That summer, the children went to Michigan to visit Carr, and were not returned.
In 1979, Carr sent the children to visit their mother in California for two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Marriage of CiganovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lyons v. Municipal Court for Central Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Joe P. Ramirez, Jose Presiado Ramirez. County of Santa Clara v. Joe P. Ramirez, Jose Presiado RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Marriage of ComerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Hoyle v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- County of Ventura v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cuccia v. CucciaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.