Legal Opinion
In Re Joe P. Ramirez, Jose Presiado Ramirez. County of Santa Clara v. Joe P. Ramirez, Jose Presiado Ramirez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1986No. 84-2612PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TANG, Circuit Judge:
The County of Santa Clara (the “County”) appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s decision that a parent’s debt to the County for reimbursement of Aid for Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) payments made to his spouse for the support of their two minor children is dischargeable in bankruptcy. The County made the AFDC payments during a period when Mr. Ramirez was under no support order nor any dissolution decree or separation agreement requiring support. We affirm.
L BACKGROUND
Jose and Yolanda Ramirez were married in February 1973…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Dimon v. DimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. DannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re: Raymond Cervantes, Debtor. County of Santa Cruz v. Raymond CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Dale H. Visness, Debtor. Dale H. Visness v. Contra Costa County Contra Costa County District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re: Paul Alan Leibowitz, Debtor. Paul Alan Leibowitz v. County of Orange Tony Rackauckas, 1 District Attorney of County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- City of El Dorado v. Crouch (In Re Crouch)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.