Legal Opinion

People v. Acosta

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1985No. A027088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that a defendant resentenced to prison under Welfare and Institutions Code section 1737 after a commitment to the Youth Authority is not entitled to conduct credit for time spent in Youth Authority facilities. The People appeal from an order granting Samuel Acosta such conduct credit. We reverse as to the granting of that credit.

On October 16, 1980, Acosta pleaded guilty to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)) and admitted a great bodily injury allegation (Pen. Code, § 12022.7). The offense occurred on November 18, 1979, when Acosta…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. People v. NajeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API