Legal Opinion
Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1997No. 95-2013PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. Jerome and Jane Hoepker (collectively Hoepkers) sought preliminary plat approval for a proposed residential subdivision from the City of Madison Plan Commission and the City of Madison Common Council (collectively "City"). The City approved the preliminary plat, subject to eight conditions. The Hoepkers sought certiorari review, challenging two conditions which require them: (1) to agree to annex the land encompassed by the preliminary plat to the City; and (2) to reconfigure their plat to provide an open space corridor. The Circuit Court for Dane County, Gerald C. Nichol, Judge, entered…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blumenthal Investment Trusts v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Eberle v. Dane County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Wood v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Goepfert v. FillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Town of Baraboo v. Village of West BarabooCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.