Legal Opinion

People v. Kinne

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1938No. Crim. 3033PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The defendant, accused by information of the offense of rape, was found guilty by the court, sitting without a jury. It was stipulated at the trial that the issue should be submitted to the court on the transcript of the evidence introduced at the preliminary hearing. This appeal is from the sentence and judgment, and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The evidence reveals the following facts: the prosecutrix was 22 years of age and a seamstress by occupation. She was a single woman at the time of the alleged attack, but had previously been married. On the night of June…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. BonzaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. TrappsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API