Legal Opinion

People v. Cook

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1935No. Crim. 1460PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendant was found guilty of an offense based upon subdivisions 1, 3 and 4 of section 261 of the Penal Code. From the judgment of the court following the conviction and the order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals, assigning as causes therefor, two grounds:

1st. That the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of the jury;

2d. That the trial court committed error in refusing to properly instruct the jury after retirement.

That the evidence introduced at the trial is sufficient to support the verdict is beyond question, if believed by the jury. The prosecuting witness…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Devoy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bulls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. People v. BurnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. KinneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API