Legal Opinion

People v. Goldsmith

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1933No. Docket No. 2306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

From a judgment of conviction on each of two counts contained in an information wherein he was charged with the commission of the crime of rape, as well as from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied, defendant has appealed to this court.

Although appellant, has divided his point into many different parts and by each of them has urged a reason couched in language different from either or all the others, the sum and substance of the several grounds thus presented for reversal of the judgment and the order herein is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment.

An…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. BonzaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. People v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KinneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API