Legal Opinion

People v. Bonzani

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1914No. Crim. No. 251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was informed against by the district attorney of Stanislaus County for the crime of rape and upon his trial was by the jury adjudged guilty of said crime. This appeal is by the defendant from the judgment.

The principal point upon which a reversal of the judgment is urged is that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict.

The alleged crime was committed on a ranch situated about a mile north of Crow’s Landing, in Stanislaus County, on the twentieth day of August, 1913. The prosecutrix, or the female with and upon whom the crime charged is alleged to have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. BreckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MeravigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. State v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People v. AllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. People v. KinneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API