Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Haskell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1911No. Nos. 17,328—(54)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Motion in the district court for Hennepin county to amend a judgment awarding alimony to plaintiff. The motion was heard by Steele, J., who denied the motion. From the order denying his motion, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for the modification of a judgment awarding alimony in a divorce action. The judgment was entered in 1905 on complaint of the respondent. She was granted an absolute divorce, and was given the custody of four minor children. The judgment further provided:
“It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that plaintiff is entitled to have and receive by way of alimony out of the estate of said William E. Haskell, defendant, and said defendant is hereby ordered and adjudged to pay to the plaintiff, the sum of five thousand ($5,000) dollars per annum…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Semrow v. SemrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Weld v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Barbaras v. BarbarasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Levine v. LevineOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Webber v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Lindbloom v. LindbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.