Legal Opinion

Adelsperger v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 88, Calendar No. 34,280PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The jury found that plaintiff’s personal injuries were caused proximately by negligence of defendant city, and assessed damages at $7,500. Defendant brings error and presents many questions, all of which have been considered, some of which will be discussed.

The chief contention is that verdict ought to have been directed for defendant on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence on its part. On this question the evidence must be viewed most fav orably to plaintiff. Plaintiff was a passenger for hire in a motor bns of defendant on one of its streets. Seats of the bus were occupied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ottinger v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Borski v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Clifford v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Wilkins v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hickey v. ZezulkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Mulcahy v. Argo Steel Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Wallace v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dahl v. GloverMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API