Legal Opinion

Ottinger v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1911No. Docket No. 137PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Mabel Ottinger against the Detroit United Railway. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff, a married woman, in company with another woman, and plaintiff’s husband, boarded one of defendant’s street cars. The car started before she secured a seat; the car being well filled and unoccupied seats few. She caused her lady friend, a guest, to take the first vacant seat she came to, and con-*107tinned forward in the oar. As she stood holding onto a seat, a passenger moved to make room for her, and she turned to sit down. At that moment the brake was put on to stop the car at a switch, and she fell forward and was injured. She said that the car stopped so suddenly that her hold…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. President of the Baltimore & Yorktown Turnpike Road v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Etson v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sharp v. New Orleans City R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Bradley v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Adelsperger v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Selman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Longfellow v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bogart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API