Legal Opinion
Nancie Cloe v. City of Indianapolis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 9, 2013No. 12-1713PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Nancie J. Cloe started working for the City of Indianapolis in April 2007. In March 2008, she was tragically diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (“MS”), a chronic, incurable neurological disorder that rendered her disabled and significantly impaired her day-to-day life. On June 29, 2009, the City terminated her, ostensibly for poor performance. Cloe sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., alleging that the City (1) discriminated against her because of her disability; (2) failed to reasonably accommodate her disability; and (3)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Stephanie Carlson v. CSX Transportation, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Feist v. Louisiana, Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Brenda Scheidler v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Susan Ball v. Cherie KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.